Outland is also the
name of a Gary Numan album. And it's an anagram of 'Old tuna'.
|
|
|
|

The same production credit graced the following year's Bladerunner.
I don't know whether the off-white background is supposed to reflect
the murky cinematography of that film and Outland, or whether
it's just a poor-quality transfer. They didn't have
Photoshop's 'Smart Blur' filter in those days.
I know only one fact about the Ladd Company - it was founded by Alan
Ladd, Jr. Apart from Bladerunner, Looker, The
Right Stuff and Outland, I haven't
seen this credit elsewhere. I don't know whether the Ladd Company still
exists and, if it does, whether it's still an independent entity producing
films, or whether it's just a name.
The UK division was located at 6 Broad St Place, London, EC2, according
to the end titles. That's just around the corner from Liverpool St.
Station.
I had to rotate this image clockwise by 0.33 of a degree in order to
make it perfectly horizontal. It looked odd, otherwise. The logo
gradually fades in, before exploding in a burst
of light, in a manner not entirely unlike that of a certain other science-fiction
film set largely in dark corridors. Which is odd, as Outland
isn't actually a horror film. There are a couple of scary sequences
involving decompression, but the meat of the film is a routine detective
thriller.
Outland looks a lot like Alien. There, I've said it. It
was no doubt rushed into production in order to ride the short-lived
wave of major sci-fi horror films that petered out during the 80s. This
period coincided with the rise of cyberpunk sci-fi, with John Brunner's
The Shockwave Rider and William Gibson's Neuromancer,
and with the rise of post-modernism as a trendy thing to cite when producing
works of art. I could go on about how Alien and Outland
reflect this but I won't because I'm neither interested in nor informed
enough about the subject to speak authoritatively.
|
|
|
1. Some films possess
greatness. Outland does not. It will never be remastered and
re-released to the cinema; there will never be a Criterion Collection
DVD boxed set; and, should NASA choose to launch a third Voyager space
probe, they will not include a copy of the DVD to illustrate human culture.
Nonetheless, Outland has three claims to fame.
Claim One: It stars Sean Connery, back when Sean Connery actually
starred in films. Ever since Highlander he's been a supporting
player, albeit an extremely popular one - his last proper leading role
was in Medicine Man in 1992.
Even when the film isn't very good, Connery is interesting to watch.
In this respect he's a bit like Michael Caine, although Connery's agent
is more discerning. Whilst Caine has The Swarm, Jaws IV
and The Holcrot Covenant under his belt, Connery's closest brush
with awfulness was Meteor, which wasn't so much bad as just dull.
Outland was Connery's next film, and although he still had Sword
of the Valiant to look forward to, his career picked up afterwards.
He still appears in his fair share of dross (The Avengers, for
example), but he will remain massively famous and rich until he dies,
which is more than can be said of, say, Patrick Swayze.
Claim Two: Outland has exploding people. A little bit
of graphic gore can do wonders for a film's box-office potential, even
more so in the early-80s. Scanners, Alien and Eraserhead
brought David Cronenberg, Ridley Scott and David Lynch to the attention
of mainstream audiences, and that's without mentioning people who became
famous for gore alone - Herschell Gordon Lewis, George A Romero, Tode
Hooper, Dario Argento et al.
As a film's raison d'être, graphic nastiness fell out of favour
as the 80s wore on - John Carpenter's 1982 The Thing provoked
and early backlash, whilst the Friday the Thirteenth and Nightmare
on Elm Street films became progressively less bloody and more MTV-friendly
with each episode. Ultra-violence took over as a fad in the late-80s,
with mainstream action pictures such as Robocop and Predator,
but by the end of the 90s a conservative cinematic climate meant that
violence was usually restricted to art films.
Natural Born Killers, Hannibal and Saving Private Ryan
had varying pretensions to being high art, whereas the various Tarantino
clones could hide behind a post-modern, ironic, mock-film noir
cloak. You're supposed to laugh at the killings in Very Bad Things,
for example, although they aren't very funny.
This ironic approach comes about because film-makers don't have the
courage to say something heartfelt. Either that, or they don't have
anything to say.
Claim Three: Outland looks a bit like Alien. The
visual evocation of a grimy mining colony is extremely effective, and
so much effort is put into the sets that the film seems almost like
an episode of a long-running, expensive television series in which the
environment is the co-star. Rather like Space: 1999, in fact,
in that the sets and effects are much more interesting than the things
happening in front of them.
3. Outland is essentially High Noon but set on
a moon of Jupiter. Or rather, the second half of the film is essentially
High Noon. The first half is a detective thriller which sets
up the second half.
High Noon was released in 1952 and starred Gary Cooper. It was
a modestly-budgeted, small-scale Western that took place in real time
and had a socialist message that probably doesn't go down too well nowadays
on the internet. Like Casablanca, Bad Day at Black Rock
and The Terminator, it has become a classic partially because
of its utilisation of limited resources, and partially because it is
a good film.
Outland is as small-scale as High Noon - nobody involved
was under the impression that they were making a classic - but seems
to have a respectable budget. It does not take place in real time, and
it doesn't have much of a message, either. In High Noon our Sheriff
hero found himself in danger, and was shunned by his townsfolk. In Outland,
our hero finds himself in a more complex predicament, and is shunned
by his corrupt deputies. In high Noon the message is that, as
civilians, we can't just mind our own businesses and hope that things
will be okay for other people, whereas in Outland the message
is that, if you're a policeman, you shouldn't be corrupt.
In general, Outland suffers from being set in a much larger playground.
The mining colony appears to be so vast that our hero could hide from
his would-be assassins for weeks.
1. I first saw Outland on a small black and white television
at about half-past-twelve at night. It's one of those films that gets
shown quite late, as a filler. In this respect it's similar to Sean
Connery's other sci-fi effort, Zardoz. The similarities end there.
I don't think Zardoz is out on DVD yet.
1. Outland hasn't dated all that badly. The mining colony
is purely functional, the music is orchestral (more of that in a moment),
the actors are fairly anonymous and there aren't any outlandish fashions.
Technically, the computer displays and captions are dated, although
it's interesting to note that, even today, computer displays in films
tend to have green text on a black background.
There isn't a great deal of modelwork - the mining colony itself is
hidden in darkness, and the shuttle that delivers the assassins is shown
mostly as a flashing light and some engine wash.
One thing that does date it, however, is that the cast are all over
thirty years old, in some cases over forty. That would never happen
nowadays.
1. The music for Outland is by Jerry Goldsmith, an insanely-prolific
composer whose previous two scores were for Alien and Star
Trek: The Motion Picture. He became famous for his atonal, avant-garde
score for Planet of the Apes, and won an Oscar for The Omen.
He has been nominated for 'Best Score' fifteen times, and is presumably
quite relaxed about the whole thing.
A decent orchestral score can make a film seem classy. Robocop,
for example, would have been less effective if the music had been mid-80s
synth rock. This is probably because it costs a lot of money to hire
an orchestra, and I should imagine that a bad producer would be unable
to see the point in spending money on stuff that, in his opinion, does
not matter.
But it does matter. Think of every single American television movie
ever. Even the modern ones have the same kind of rubbish mid-80s synth
rock. Either the producers just don't care about the music, or there's
one composer who has a monopoly on American television movies, and he's
useless at making music.
5. Steven Berkoff is in it. I had forgotten that. He gets killed
in the chest with a shotgun.
Outland came before his his short-lived excursion into mainstream
cinema, during which he appeared as villains in the James Bond film
Octopussy and Beverly Hills Cop. The latter is one of
the key films of the 80s, updating the Thin Man-esqe comedy /
thriller genre for the modern age. Rush Hour was essentially
Beverly Hills Cop without the swearing. Yet it isn't out on DVD.
3. Peter Hyams, the director, is a jazz drummer and painter when
he is not being a director. He's directed lots of films which, like
Outland, will never be classics, but which are fairly well-known
and watchable. 2010 and Capricorn One were the high spots,
and tend to suggest that he's very good at creating a setting, but not
quite as good at giving his characters something interesting to do.
He often writes and photographs his films, but he will never have an
airport named after him and there will never be a boxed set of Peter
Hyam's films.
In recent years he's moved from 'action thrillers' to pure action films,
with Timecop, Sudden Death, and his most recent major effort,
End of Days. Of those, Sudden Death was a decent Die
Hard clone, Timecop was, along with Universal Soldier,
a failed attempt to turn Jean Claude Van Damme into a mainstream Hollywood
star, and End of Days was a distressingly poor waste of Arnold
Schwarzenegger.
3. The film is set on Io, the most famous of Jupiter's moons,
and the one most likely to have a mining colony on it. Uniquely of all
the moons in the solar system, it displays evidence of volcanism, and
thus elements buried in the moon's crust are regularly churned up to
the surface where they can be mined.
Io is an almost literally hellish environment - the surface is covered
with sulphur, and the moon is a nasty patchwork of dirty yellows and
browns. Scientists theorise that Io's proximity to Jupiter's massive
gravity means that the moon is constantly being 'kneaded', which causes
the volcanic activity.
I know all this from Arthur C. Clarke's 2010, which is set amongst
Jupiter's moons, and presumably Peter Hyams knew all this from NASA's
1974 Pioneer 10 and 1979 Voyager 1 and Voyager 2
flybys.
Let's give a round of applause to Voyager 2. It went off to Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune and is now heading off into interstellar
space, still sending back faint signals. I know it's just a car-sized
piece of scientific equipment, but I feel sorry for the poor thing,
spinning off into infinity. Mind you, if the Sun blows up, it'll be
the only thing left.
3. The sets. Halfway through there's a chase sequence. Impressively,
it's done with a series of what appear to be continuous Steadicam shots,
one of which starts in a dormitory area before moving through a couple
of tunnels. I don't know if Hyams 'cheated' by redressing an existing
location (such as the abandoned steelworks that stand in for spaceships
in a million and one DTV sci-fi films), but it's very impressive nonetheless.
The chase ends with the villain trying to force Sean Connery's head
into a deep-fat-fryer filled with chips, which is a nice touch - in
the future, people will still need potatoes. They keep well, they don't
take up much space, they're cheap, and they're versatile. With potatoes
you can make chips, crisps, and, er, mashed potatoes. You can roast
them. You can boil them. You can fry them. You can ferment them and
make vodka. You can use them as projectiles. You can add eyes and legs
and use them as toys. You can talk to them, smash them in your hands,
stab them over and over and over, break them into pieces and stamp on
them to relieve stress. All kinds of things.
3. The blurb on the back of the box is quite heroic - it manages
to hype up a middling film without seeming silly. Nonetheless, it uses
the word 'spellbinding', not a word I would associate with Outland.
The Princess Bride, yes, but not Outland. Still, kudos
to the copywriter. Millions of people around the world read your work
without ever caring about it or knowing who you are. I should imagine
that most people don't even stop to think that it was written by a person,
they probably think it just appeared there spontaneously.
3. Well, what else is there to say about Outland? It came
out shortly after Saturn 3, a similarly average sci-fi flick,
although it's less interesting in that Saturn 3 was written by
Martin Amis, and had Harvey Keitel in an early role, and a cool robot.
There aren't any cool robots in Outland and it wasn't written
by the author of London Fields and it doesn't star an actor who
went on to become famous for playing morally-dubious characters. I don't
think that Sean Connery has ever played a villain. Unless you
count The Avengers, in which he played a villain. So I'm wrong.
I'm writing this whilst listening to Sigue Sigue Sputnik's Flaunt
It. At this very moment I'm halfway through 'Sex Bomb Boogie'. Most
of the songs have three chords and bags of attitude. This sounds great
in theory. Lots of things sound great in theory. Surviving an aeroplane
crash by jumping into the air at the exact moment of impact sounds great
in theory. So does kidnapping a woman and making her a sex-slave. Or
performing cunnilingus. Or being a sniper. The reality is never quite
as good as the fantasy. There's always a mundane detail that brings
everything crashing down.
Besides which, I always thought that the 'three chords and lots of attitude'
ethic was purely a starting-point. I think the original quote was something
like "here's a chord, here's another, here's a third - now form
a band". I don't think there was any rule about sticking to three
chords.
Mind you, you can do a lot with three chords. Anarchy in the UK
had three chords, I think. I'm not a trained musician so I'm not sure.
The 'I am an antichrist' bit has once chord, although there seem to
be a couple of quick ones just after 'antichrist'. The 'And aaaaaaaah
want to' bit has a second, whilst the 'beeeee, anarchy' bit has the
third. Pretty Vacant is similar.
Whigfield's Saturday Night has two chords, I think. So does Frankie
Goes to Hollywood's Relax. I think that Sigue Sigue Sputnik wanted
to be a bit like Frankie Goes to Hollywood, but they didn't have Trevor
Horn to tell them what to do.
|
|
|
|
Dating In Hong Kong On FirstClickFriend.Com Offers Online Dating Services And Online Personals For All Regions In Hong Kong. Dating In Hong Kong Can Be Really Successful Ith FirstClickFriend.Com 
If nothing else, Outland was a big influence on low-budget film-makers
in the decade that followed. If you couldn't afford to create a convincing-looking
mining colony, all you had to do was find an abandoned factory, fill
it with smoke and neon lights, underexpose the film, and voilá!
Even if they aren't standing in for space stations, factories are staples
of low-budget cinema. Roger Ebert calls them 'abandoned flame factories'
because all they seem to produce is fire.
Note the funky widescreen distortion in the image above - Outland
is in proper widescreen, no doubt a clause in Sean Connery's contract or
something.
You could make a film out of the bits of other films where one or more
of the leading characters have used ventilation ducts in which to sneak
around. Alien and Die Hard are the benchmark 'duct films'.
Outland only has a short sequence set in a duct, and it's a very
small duct. I don't know when ducts became such an important part of
cinema. It probably has something to do with the increasing use of air
conditioning throughout the latter half of the twentieth century. I'm
sure there's a thesis in there somewhere.
The original Star Trek television series had 'Jeffries' tubes'.
But they usually played no part in the action.
Outland is so derivative of Alien that it even has an
actor who looks like Harry Dean Stanton. No doubt there's an agency
that can supply Harry Dean Stanton lookalikes when the real thing isn't
available.

Outland features some primitive CGI. At least, I assume it's
CGI. It was common practice at the time to use cel animation instead
of CGI - such as in 2001 or The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the
Galaxy - but the displays in Outland look like the genuine
article. There isn't a credit for 'Computer displays by Electrovision
Co, California' or something similar, although there is, oddly, a credit
for 'Kitchen appliances', 'courtesy of Crypto Peerless Ltd / Stott Benham,
Birmingham, England'.
People who know people who worked on 2001 like to bring that
fact up at dinner parties; I doubt if people who know people who worked
on Outland do the same.
Why is a manufacturer of kitchen appliances called 'Crypto Peerless'?
They sound as if they should be a data security firm. Having
looked them up on the internet I know that 'Tim Parker' used to be in
charge of them. They don't have a homepage, it would appear
(amusingly, this very page is the sixth or seventh result from
Google, and the fifth for 'Stott Benham' (who are now part of
Electrolux)).

A kitchen, perhaps supplied by Crypto Peerless / Stott Benham. The back
of the DVD box has a shot of our hero embracing his wife, presumably
to entice women to buy the film (don't laugh - that's how marketing
departments work), despite the fact that she's only in it for a few
minutes. For most of the film our hero has a platonic relationship with
a crusty doctor who happens to be a middle-aged woman. This would not
happen in a modern film. The doctor would look like a supermodel and
Sean Connery's character would be in his early-twenties.
|
|
|
| |